Physics-Aware AI for Mission-Critical Manufacturing

Validated across four chemistries · Six public benchmarks

Battery pilot, week 1.From cycler data to ranked risk in five working days.

Historian credentials to first prediction in five working days — AVEVA PI, Aspen InfoPlus.21, Siemens Opcenter, and Ignition connect out of the box. Validated on six public benchmarks across LFP, LCO, NMC, and Na-ion.

Built by Oxford and Tesla-trained AI & battery engineers. Advised by senior leaders from Google DeepMind, AWS Chronos, and the World Energy Council.

Built for

Manufacturing EngineeringProcess EngineeringQuality EngineeringCell EngineeringProduction Leadership

The problem

Three problems we hear every time we talk to a plant team

Defect risk becomes expensive when plant teams can't turn scattered process, lot, equipment, and quality history into timely action.

By the time you see it, you've already lost the material

Formation and aging mean your quality signal arrives weeks after the upstream cause. Every event carries hidden committed cost.

Your data exists. It just doesn't talk to itself.

MES, historian, SPC, QMS, shift notes — the data is there. Getting it to line up around a specific defect event is the actual engineering problem.

Half the investigation is just finding the starting point.

Before your team can investigate, they have to reconstruct what happened across five systems. That's hours per event, every time.

Pilot motion

First signal in 5 days

Lychee scopes a tight first pilot — one line, one defect family, one KPI — so plant teams can evaluate fast.

0 days

From historian credentials to first prediction

Historian, MES, and lot context connected, validated, and surfacing risk on real lots.

0 weeks earlier

Than your current process catches them

Defects flagged from coating-and-drying signals before formation confirms — the gap where scrap and cycle time compound.

01

Ingest

Connect historian, MES, and lot context — AVEVA PI, Aspen InfoPlus.21, Siemens Opcenter, Ignition. No new data collection required.

02

Predict & Explain

Ranked-risk queue across lots and chemistries, with upstream driver attribution and calibrated confidence intervals. Every flag ships with an interval — not a score, an interval.

03

Close the Loop

Investigations feed back to the model. Each resolved case sharpens the next flag.

02 — From research wins to factory wins

Why battery manufacturers choose Lychee

Lychee beats the field’s published gold standard (Severson 2019, Nature Energy) — and outperforms standard ML across every Li-ion chemistry where generic foundation models like AWS Chronos break down on real, fragmented production data. Six public datasets, five labs, four chemistries (LFP, LCO, NMC, Na-ion) — one hybrid, no retraining per launch. For plant teams: defect risk surfaces weeks earlier, across every chemistry on your line.

Early defect detectionMIT · Stanford · SLAC benchmark

Spot defective cells in 100 cycles — weeks before downstream QC confirms it

Beats Severson 2019 (Nature Energy) on the field's primary cycle-life benchmark — 8.9% vs 9.1% published¹

Dataset
Severson primary (LFP, n=42, MIT-Stanford-SLAC)
Task
Cycle-life prediction · pooled b1+b2 alternating split
Comparator
Lychee hybrid vs. Severson 2019 published vs. physics-only baseline

8.9%

Lychee hybrid · median error¹

9.1%

Severson 2019 (Nature Energy)¹

24.7%

Physics-only baseline

Plant teams today learn a cell is defective from lifetime testing — months after coating, drying, and formation. Lychee reads the early-cycle signature: variance in how voltage-capacity curves warp between cycles 10 and 100 surfaces defect risk weeks before downstream QC confirms it. Validated on the canonical MIT-Stanford-SLAC benchmark — Lychee's hybrid edges the field's published Nature Energy result (8.9% vs 9.1%) and runs 15.8 percentage points tighter than physics-only baselines. Same hybrid now validated on six public benchmarks across four chemistries (LFP, LCO, NMC, Na-ion) and five labs.

Using discharge voltage curves from early cycles yet to exhibit capacity degradation, we apply machine-learning tools to predict cycle life.
Severson et al. — Nature Energy, 2019 →

124 commercial Li-ion cells · A123 LFP chemistry · public benchmark

Built for battery physicsChronos · AWS

Lychee beats generic AI by up to 150ײ

Same hybrid across LFP, LCO, NMC where generic AI breaks down — no retraining per launch²

Dataset
Severson + CALCE + NASA + Oxford + BatteryLife · LFP, LCO, NMC, Na-ion across five labs
Task
Cycle-life prediction across chemistries · same model, no retuning
Comparator
Lychee hybrid vs. Chronos zero-shot (AWS)

5–12%

Lychee hybrid · median error across 5 benchmarks

400–760%

Chronos zero-shot · breaks down on 3 of 4 tested²

30–150×

Tighter than Chronos zero-shot²

Plant teams hear 'AI for batteries' from every vendor. Most pitch generic time-series models — the same class as AWS Chronos, the leading foundation model for forecasting. On battery degradation, Chronos breaks down at 400–760% error: it forecasts flat capacity and can't resolve the slow per-cycle drop where defects hide. Lychee uses the same architecture class — a senior Lychee advisor led Chronos at AWS — but adds physics grounding so the model holds where generic AI flatlines. Under 10% error on four of five tested benchmarks, across LFP, LCO, NMC, and Na-ion — five labs, same hybrid, no retraining per launch. For plant teams: ranked-risk cells weeks earlier, every chemistry on the line.

Chronos models trained on a corpus of public datasets have comparable or, occasionally, superior zero-shot performance on new datasets, relative to methods trained specifically on them.
Ansari et al. — Chronos paper, AWS 2024 →

Lead Chronos architect (AWS) advises Lychee Labs

Team and advisors from

Reads from

AVEVA PI System · Siemens Opcenter · Aspen InfoPlus.21 · Ignition by Inductive Automation · custom historian and CSV exports

Data security

Process data stays in your environment. On-premises and private-cloud deployments supported.

01 — Economic stakes

Why earlier visibility matters

Scrap, delayed visibility, and small yield movements become material at factory scale.

~€10M/yr

Per 1-point gain

At 40 GWh/year scale, even a 1-point improvement can be worth about this much annually.

70-80%

Early-ramp scrap

Hazardous waste and lost value can reach this level in early battery-factory ramp-up.

3 wks

Cycle-time delay

Formation and aging mean defects are often recognized only after weeks of added time and value.

32%

Cell-cost impact

Battery quality failures do not just hit inspection. They hit a large share of total cell cost.

Delayed discovery is a capital-efficiency problem.

Mineral efficiency

Yield improvement is also a critical-mineral-efficiency lever. Each percentage point of yield at 40 GWh scale reduces lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite waste per cell — directly relevant to EU Battery Regulation traceability and UK supply-chain competitiveness goals.

The workflow panel

What plant teams see

A live operations view of the line: ranked-risk queue across lots and chemistries, drift-flag chart with confidence and lead-time, likely upstream drivers, and a recommended next step. Investigations open with structure, not a blank screen.

Lychee Labs logoLychee Labs
Live
Line A·LFP / Graphite·Operator: J. Walsh
Cycle 42 / 100

Capacity drift · LOT-0427

Flagged 3 weeks before formation confirms

Confidence

0.84

Detected

Cycle 30

Recommended

Quarantine LOT-0427 batch

Estimated value

€41k saved

Risk queue · 3 active

Updated 14:42

LOT-0427LFP

Formation outlier risk

High

0.91

LOT-0419LFP

Coating drift

Elevated

0.74

LOT-0398NMC

Drying variance

Monitor

0.53

Likely upstream drivers

Pump fluctuation

Slot-die line A2

0.81

Slurry viscosity shift

Mixer 03

0.74

Coating head imbalance

Line A · 14:32

0.63

Why now

Global gigafactory expansion. EU and China regulation tightening.

Manufacturing capacity scaling in the UK, Europe, and China simultaneously — with regulatory requirements tightening across all three. Earlier defect visibility is the lever that compounds across every dimension.

Global gigafactory expansion

CATL, BYD, Envision AESC, and Tata Agratas are all ramping simultaneously — Erfurt, Sunderland, Shenzhen. Yield and ramp speed decide whether they reach nameplate capacity.

EU Battery Regulation, 2027

Chapter VII obligations require per-cell process and lifecycle data most plants don't yet capture. Affects every European manufacturer — and every Chinese producer exporting to the EU.

Na-ion scale-up

CATL, BYD, and HKUST-GZ are scaling Na-ion to market. New chemistry means new quality profiles. Lychee's 4.3% APE on the BatteryLife Na-ion benchmark is the first published validation on this architecture.³

Critical-mineral efficiency

Each yield point at 40 GWh reduces lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite waste. Supply-chain competitiveness from Sheffield to Shenzhen.

Lychee Labs logoLychee Labs
Where Lychee inserts in the process

Battery process flow

Lychee learns from upstream signals at coating, drying, and calendaring — flagging defect risk weeks before formation testing surfaces the same loss.

Lychee detection window
Confirms

01

Coating

Slot-die thickness, pump speed

02

Drying

Solvent residual, web tension

03

Calendaring

Density, thickness variance

04

Formation

Capacity, coulombic efficiency

~3 weeks earlier

Why upstream

Coating, drying, and calendaring carry the earliest physical evidence of the defects formation later confirms.

Why it compounds

Every cycle past detection adds material, labor, and downstream cost — the cost of finding it later.

Linda Hong Cheng
We started Lychee because every battery engineer we talked to lost weeks to investigations that should've taken hours. If that's your reality, I want to hear from you.

Linda Hong ChengFounder & CEO

Next step

Working on battery yield, scrap, or diagnosis speed?

Scope a manufacturing pilot

Start with one line, one defect family, and one KPI.

Scope A Pilot

Download 1-pager

Share the short overview with technical, manufacturing, or investment stakeholders.

Download 1-pager

1 Severson 2019 (Nature Energy) primary split: Lychee’s 8.9% median APE beats the published 9.1%. On the secondary split (held-out novel protocols), Severson 2019 reaches 8.6% with the full feature set; Lychee runs 11.9% on that harder generalization regime — reported transparently on /benchmarks.

230–150× tighter than Chronos zero-shot (AWS) applies to the three of four datasets where Chronos was tested — Severson primary, Severson secondary, and CALCE CS2. NASA PCoE (n=4) shows small-sample variance in Chronos’s median; Oxford NMC was not run against Chronos in this benchmark cycle.

3 BatteryLife Na-ion benchmark (HKUST-GZ, n=31 cells, 3 charge protocols, LOO-CV across cells): Lychee median APE 4.3% — first known published result on a public Na-ion cycle-life benchmark. Methodology and dataset details on /benchmarks.